Internal
problem
ID
[4090] Book
:
Applied
Differential
equations,
Newby
Curle.
Van
Nostrand
Reinhold.
1972 Section
:
Examples,
page
35 Problem
number
:
4 Date
solved
:
Friday, February 21, 2025 at 08:39:26 AM CAS
classification
:
[[_homogeneous, `class C`], _rational, _Riccati]
An ode of the form \(Y' = \frac {M(X,Y)}{N(X,Y)}\) is called homogeneous if the functions \(M(X,Y)\) and \(N(X,Y)\) are both homogeneous functions and of the same order. Recall that a function \(f(X,Y)\) is homogeneous of order \(n\) if
\[ f(t^n X, t^n Y)= t^n f(X,Y) \]
In this case, it can be seen that both \(M=Y \left (X +Y \right )\) and \(N=X^{2}\) are both homogeneous and of the same order \(n=2\). Therefore this is a homogeneous ode. Since this ode is homogeneous, it is converted to separable ODE using the substitution \(u=\frac {Y}{X}\), or \(Y=uX\). Hence
We now need to find the singular solutions, these are found by finding for what values \(g(u)\) is zero, since we had to divide by this above. Solving \(g(u)=0\) or
\[
u^{2}=0
\]
for \(u \left (X \right )\) gives
\begin{align*} u \left (X \right )&=0 \end{align*}
Now we go over each such singular solution and check if it verifies the ode itself and any initial conditions given. If it does not then the singular solution will not be used.
Substituting equations (1E,2E) and \(\omega \) into (A) gives
\begin{equation}
\tag{5E} b_{2}+\frac {\left (x y +y^{2}-x -2 y +1\right ) \left (b_{3}-a_{2}\right )}{x^{2}}-\frac {\left (x y +y^{2}-x -2 y +1\right )^{2} a_{3}}{x^{4}}-\left (\frac {y -1}{x^{2}}-\frac {2 \left (x y +y^{2}-x -2 y +1\right )}{x^{3}}\right ) \left (x a_{2}+y a_{3}+a_{1}\right )-\frac {\left (2 y +x -2\right ) \left (x b_{2}+y b_{3}+b_{1}\right )}{x^{2}} = 0
\end{equation}
Putting the above in normal form gives
\[
-\frac {2 x^{3} y b_{2}-x^{2} y^{2} a_{2}+x^{2} y^{2} b_{3}+y^{4} a_{3}+x^{3} b_{1}-2 x^{3} b_{2}+x^{3} b_{3}-x^{2} y a_{1}+2 x^{2} y a_{2}-x^{2} y a_{3}+2 x^{2} y b_{1}-2 x \,y^{2} a_{1}-2 x \,y^{2} a_{3}-4 y^{3} a_{3}+x^{2} a_{1}-x^{2} a_{2}+x^{2} a_{3}-2 x^{2} b_{1}-x^{2} b_{3}+4 x y a_{1}+4 x y a_{3}+6 y^{2} a_{3}-2 x a_{1}-2 x a_{3}-4 y a_{3}+a_{3}}{x^{4}} = 0
\]
Setting the numerator to zero gives
\begin{equation}
\tag{6E} -2 x^{3} y b_{2}+x^{2} y^{2} a_{2}-x^{2} y^{2} b_{3}-y^{4} a_{3}-x^{3} b_{1}+2 x^{3} b_{2}-x^{3} b_{3}+x^{2} y a_{1}-2 x^{2} y a_{2}+x^{2} y a_{3}-2 x^{2} y b_{1}+2 x \,y^{2} a_{1}+2 x \,y^{2} a_{3}+4 y^{3} a_{3}-x^{2} a_{1}+x^{2} a_{2}-x^{2} a_{3}+2 x^{2} b_{1}+x^{2} b_{3}-4 x y a_{1}-4 x y a_{3}-6 y^{2} a_{3}+2 x a_{1}+2 x a_{3}+4 y a_{3}-a_{3} = 0
\end{equation}
Looking at the above PDE shows the following are all the terms with \(\{x, y\}\) in them.
\[
\{x, y\}
\]
The following substitution is now made to be able to collect on
all terms with \(\{x, y\}\) in them
Substituting the above solution in the anstaz (1E,2E) (using \(1\) as arbitrary value for any unknown in the RHS) gives
\begin{align*}
\xi &= x \\
\eta &= y -1 \\
\end{align*}
The next step is to determine the canonical coordinates \(R,S\). The canonical coordinates map \(\left ( x,y\right ) \to \left ( R,S \right )\) where \(\left ( R,S \right )\) are the canonical coordinates which make the original ode become a quadrature and hence solved by integration.
The characteristic pde which is used to find the canonical coordinates is
The above comes from the requirements that \(\left ( \xi \frac {\partial }{\partial x} + \eta \frac {\partial }{\partial y}\right ) S(x,y) = 1\). Starting with the first pair of ode’s in (1) gives an ode to solve for the independent variable \(R\) in the canonical coordinates, where \(S(R)\). Therefore
Where the constant of integration is set to zero as we just need one solution. Now that \(R,S\) are found, we need to setup the ode in these coordinates. This is done by evaluating
We now need to express the RHS as function of \(R\) only. This is done by solving for \(x,y\) in terms of \(R,S\) from the result obtained earlier and simplifying. This gives
The above is a quadrature ode. This is the whole point of Lie symmetry method. It converts an ode, no matter how complicated it is, to one that can be solved by integration when the ode is in the canonical coordiates \(R,S\).
Since the ode has the form \(\frac {d}{d R}S \left (R \right )=f(R)\), then we only need to integrate \(f(R)\).
Equation (7) is now solved. After finding \(z(x)\) then \(u\) is found using the inverse transformation
\begin{align*} u &= z \left (x \right ) e^{-\int \frac {B}{2 A} \,dx} \end{align*}
The first step is to determine the case of Kovacic algorithm this ode belongs to. There are 3 cases depending on the order of poles of \(r\) and the order of \(r\) at \(\infty \). The following table summarizes these cases.
Need to have at least one pole
that is either order \(2\) or odd order
greater than \(2\). Any other pole order
is allowed as long as the above
condition is satisfied. Hence the
following set of pole orders are all
allowed. \(\{1,2\}\),\(\{1,3\}\),\(\{2\}\),\(\{3\}\),\(\{3,4\}\),\(\{1,2,5\}\).
no condition
3
\(\left \{ 1,2\right \} \)
\(\left \{ 2,3,4,5,6,7,\cdots \right \} \)
Table 2.1: Necessary conditions for each Kovacic case
The order of \(r\) at \(\infty \) is the degree of \(t\) minus the degree of \(s\). Therefore
The poles of \(r\) in eq. (7) and the order of each pole are determined by solving for the roots of \(t=4 x^{2}\). There is a pole at \(x=0\) of order \(2\). Since there is no odd order pole larger than \(2\) and the order at \(\infty \) is \(2\) then the necessary conditions for case one are met. Since there is a pole of order \(2\) then necessary conditions for case two are met. Since pole order is not larger than \(2\) and the order at \(\infty \) is \(2\) then the necessary conditions for case three are
met. Therefore
\begin{align*} L &= [1, 2, 4, 6, 12] \end{align*}
Attempting to find a solution using case \(n=1\).
Looking at poles of order 2. The partial fractions decomposition of \(r\) is
\[
r = -\frac {1}{4 x^{2}}
\]
For the pole at \(x=0\) let \(b\) be the coefficient of \(\frac {1}{ x^{2}}\) in the partial fractions decomposition of \(r\) given above. Therefore \(b=-{\frac {1}{4}}\). Hence
Since the order of \(r\) at \(\infty \) is 2 then \([\sqrt r]_\infty =0\). Let \(b\) be the coefficient of \(\frac {1}{x^{2}}\) in the Laurent series expansion of \(r\) at \(\infty \). which can be found by dividing the leading coefficient of \(s\) by the leading coefficient of \(t\) from
\begin{alignat*}{2} r &= \frac {s}{t} &&= -\frac {1}{4 x^{2}} \end{alignat*}
Since the \(\text {gcd}(s,t)=1\). This gives \(b=-{\frac {1}{4}}\). Hence
The following table summarizes the findings so far for poles and for the order of \(r\) at \(\infty \) where \(r\) is
\[ r=-\frac {1}{4 x^{2}} \]
pole \(c\) location
pole order
\([\sqrt r]_c\)
\(\alpha _c^{+}\)
\(\alpha _c^{-}\)
\(0\)
\(2\)
\(0\)
\(\frac {1}{2}\)
\(\frac {1}{2}\)
Order of \(r\) at \(\infty \)
\([\sqrt r]_\infty \)
\(\alpha _\infty ^{+}\)
\(\alpha _\infty ^{-}\)
\(2\)
\(0\)
\(\frac {1}{2}\)
\(\frac {1}{2}\)
Now that the all \([\sqrt r]_c\) and its associated \(\alpha _c^{\pm }\) have been determined for all the poles in the set \(\Gamma \) and \([\sqrt r]_\infty \) and its associated \(\alpha _\infty ^{\pm }\) have also been found, the next step is to determine possible non negative integer \(d\) from these using
Where \(s(c)\) is either \(+\) or \(-\) and \(s(\infty )\) is the sign of \(\alpha _\infty ^{\pm }\). This is done by trial over all set of families \(s=(s(c))_{c \in \Gamma \cup {\infty }}\) until such \(d\) is found to work in finding candidate \(\omega \). Trying \(\alpha _\infty ^{-} = {\frac {1}{2}}\) then
Now that \(\omega \) is determined, the next step is find a corresponding minimal polynomial \(p(x)\) of degree \(d=0\) to solve the ode. The polynomial \(p(x)\) needs to satisfy the equation