SOLUTION:
Then we now solve for \(s\) \begin{align*} \frac{dK}{ds} & =-4s^{3}-51s^{2}-160s-100=0\\ 0 & =4s^{3}+51s^{2}+160s+100 \end{align*}
The roots are \(s=-8.287,s=-0.835,s=-3.632\). Not all these points will be break away points. Looking at the segments on the real line, we see that \(s=-0.835\) and \(s=-8.287\) are on the R.L. but \(s=-3.632\) is not. We mark these points now on the current plot and update the plot again
It is important to remember that root locus will always be symmetric with respect to the real axis.
\(s^{4}\) | \(1\) | \(80\) | \(K\) |
\(s^{3}\) | \(17\) | \(100\) | |
\(s^{2}\) | \(74.118\) | \(K\) | |
\(s^{1}\) | \(100-0.229K\) | ||
\(s^{0}\) | \(K\) | ||
We just need to find where it cross the imaginary axis. Setting the \(s^{1}\) row to zero gives \(K=436.68\). This means the closed loop will become unstable for \(k>436.68\). To find where R.L. crosses the imaginary axes, we go back to the even polynomial \(s^{2}\) (the row above the line \(s^{1}\)) in above Routh table, which yields \(74.118s^{2}+K=0\) or \(74.118s^{2}+436.68=0\), therefore \(s=\pm 2.43i\). This complete R.L. Here is the final plot
\[ G\left ( s\right ) =\frac{K}{\left ( s^{2}+s+2\right ) \left ( s+1\right ) }\]
Then we now solve for \[ \frac{dK}{ds}=3s^{2}+4s+3=0 \] The solution gives only complex roots. So we go to the next lemma.
\begin{align*}{\displaystyle \sum \limits _{zeros}} \sphericalangle z_{i}-{\displaystyle \sum \limits _{poles}} \sphericalangle p_{i} & =180^{0}+k360^{0}\text{ \ \ \ \ \ \ }k=0,1,\cdots \\ -\left ( \theta _{1}+\theta _{2}+\theta _{3}\right ) & =180^{0}+k360^{0}\\ \theta _{1} & =-180^{0}-\theta _{2}-\theta _{3}-k360^{0} \end{align*}
We see from the diagram that \(\theta _{3}=90^{0}\) and \(\theta _{2}=\tan ^{-1}\left ( \frac{1.323}{0.5}\right ) =70^{0}\), hence from above \begin{align*} \theta _{1} & =-180^{0}-70^{0}-90^{0}-k360^{0}\\ & =-340^{0}\\ & =20^{0} \end{align*}
By symmetry (R.L. is symmetric with respect to the real axis), the departure angle for the other complex pole \(s=-0.5-1.323i\) must be \(-20^{0}\). We can calculate it to make sure it is indeed \(-20^{0}\) as follows.
Let \(\theta _{3}\) be the departure angle for the lower complex pole \(s=-0.5-1.323i\), then
\begin{align*}{\displaystyle \sum \limits _{zeros}} \sphericalangle z_{i}-{\displaystyle \sum \limits _{poles}} \sphericalangle p_{i} & =180^{0}+k360^{0}\text{ \ \ \ \ \ \ }k=0,1,\cdots \\ -\left ( \theta _{1}+\theta _{2}+\theta _{3}\right ) & =180^{0}+k360^{0}\\ \theta _{3} & =-180^{0}-\theta _{2}-\theta _{1}-k360^{0} \end{align*}
But \(\theta _{2}=-70^{0}\) and \(\theta _{1}=-90^{0}\) then \(\theta _{3}=-180^{0}+70+90=-20^{0}\) as expected. The root locus plot is now updated
\(s^{3}\) | \(1\) | \(3\) |
\(s^{2}\) | \(2\) | \(K+2\) |
\(s^{1}\) | \(\frac{4-k}{2}\) | |
\(s^{0}\) | \(K+2\) | |
We need \(K=4\) (by setting the \(s^{1}\) row to zero). This means system will be unstable for \(k>4\). To find where R.L. crosses the imaginary axes, we go back to the \(s^{2}\) polynomial above the line \(s^{1}\) in Routh table, which yields \(2s^{2}+K+2=0\) or \(2s^{2}+6=0\), therefore \(s=\pm 1.73i\). This complete R.L. Here is the final plot
\[ G\left ( s\right ) =\frac{K\left ( s^{2}+2s+10\right ) }{s\left ( s+5\right ) \left ( s+10\right ) }\]
We now solve for\(\frac{dK}{ds}=0\) \begin{align*} \frac{dK}{ds} & =0\\ \frac{d}{ds}\left ( \frac{-s^{3}-15s^{2}-50s}{s^{2}+2s+10}\right ) & =0\\ \frac{s^{4}+4s^{3}+10s^{2}+300s+500}{\left ( s^{2}+2s+10\right ) ^{2}} & =0\\ s^{4}+4s^{3}+10s^{2}+300s+500 & =0 \end{align*}
The roots are \(\left \{ s=2.43\pm 5.895i,s=-1.727,s=-7.12\right \} \) We want breakaway between \(s=0\) and \(s=-5\), hence only valid value is \(-1.727\). We now go to the next lemma.
\begin{align*}{\displaystyle \sum \limits _{zeros}} \sphericalangle z_{i}-{\displaystyle \sum \limits _{poles}} \sphericalangle p_{i} & =180^{0}+k360^{0}\text{ \ \ \ \ \ \ }k=0,1,\cdots \\ \left ( \theta _{4}+\theta _{1}\right ) -\left ( \theta _{2}+\theta _{3}+\theta _{5}\right ) & =180^{0}+k360^{0} \end{align*}
Now we do a little geometry to calculate the angles. \(\theta _{4}=90^{0},\theta _{2}=\tan ^{-1}\left ( \frac{3}{10-1}\right ) =18.435^{0},\theta _{3}=\tan ^{-1}\left ( \frac{3}{4}\right ) =36.8^{0}\) and \(\theta _{5}=180-\tan ^{-1}\left ( \frac{3}{1}\right ) =108.43^{0}\). The above now becomes\begin{align*} \left ( 90^{0}+\theta _{1}\right ) -\left ( 18.435^{0}+36.8^{0}+108.43^{0}\right ) & =180^{0}+k360^{0}\\ \theta _{1} & =180^{0}-90^{0}+18.435^{0}+36.8^{0}+108.43^{0}+k360^{0}\\ & =253.67^{0}\\ & =-106.33^{0} \end{align*}
Therefore, the arrival angle at the lower zero will be \(-253.67^{0}\) or \(106.33^{0}\). The root locus now is as follows
SOLUTION:
\[ G\left ( s\right ) =\frac{K\left ( s+1\right ) \left ( s+5\right ) }{s\left ( s+1.5\right ) \left ( s+2\right ) }\]
Then we now solve for \(\frac{dK}{ds}=0\) \begin{align*} \frac{dK}{ds} & =0\\ \frac{d}{ds}\left ( \frac{-s^{3}-3.5s^{2}-3s}{s^{2}+6s+5}\right ) & =0\\ -\frac{s^{4}+12s^{3}+33s^{2}+35s+15}{s^{4}+12s^{3}+46s^{2}+60s+25} & =0\\ s^{4}+12s^{3}+33s^{2}+35s+15.0 & =0 \end{align*}
The roots are \(s=-0.823\pm 0.57i,s=-8.619,s=-1.735\) We want breakaway between \(s=-1.5\) and \(s=-2\), since these are two poles facing each others, one of the breakaway points is \(s=-1.735\) on that segment. The complex root is discarded since it is not on the real line. The point \(s=-8.619\) is valid since it is on a segment on the real line. It will be a break-in point since it is on a segment with only a zero on it. So the current plot is now as follows
The gain \(K\) any point on the roots locus is given by multiplying the distances from each pole to the that point, divided by the product of the distances from all the zeros to the same point. This comes from\begin{align*} 1+KG_{openloop} & =0\\ K & =\frac{1}{\left \vert G_{openloop}\right \vert } \end{align*}
In other words, if we want to find gain at some point \(r\), then\[ K=\frac{{\displaystyle \prod } \left \vert p_{i}r\right \vert }{{\displaystyle \prod } \left \vert z_{i}r\right \vert }\] Since the first breakaway point in this case is \(r=-1.735\) (the break away point), then the above becomes\[ K=\frac{\left ( 1.735\right ) \left ( 1.735-1.5\right ) \left ( 2-1.735\right ) }{\left ( 1.735-1\right ) \left ( 5-1.735\right ) }\] The above was done by just looking the diagram of the root locus and measuring the distance from each pole to the breakaway point, and similarly for the zeros. The above reduces to \[ \fbox{$K=0.045$}\] For the second break-in point in this case is \(r=-8.617\), therefore\[ K=\frac{\left ( 8.617\right ) \left ( 8.617-1.5\right ) \left ( 8.617-2\right ) }{\left ( 8.617-1\right ) \left ( 8.617-5\right ) }\] The above was done by just looking the diagram of the root locus and measuring the distance from each pole to the break-in point, and similarly for the zeros. The above reduces to \[ \fbox{$K=14.73$}\]
;
;
;
;
;