2.1.742 Problem 762

Solved as second order ode using Kovacic algorithm
Maple
Mathematica
Sympy

Internal problem ID [9914]
Book : Collection of Kovacic problems
Section : section 1
Problem number : 762
Date solved : Wednesday, March 05, 2025 at 08:00:51 AM
CAS classification : [_Hermite]

Solve

yxy+2y=0

Solved as second order ode using Kovacic algorithm

Time used: 0.229 (sec)

Writing the ode as

(1)yxy+2y=0(2)Ay+By+Cy=0

Comparing (1) and (2) shows that

A=1(3)B=xC=2

Applying the Liouville transformation on the dependent variable gives

z(x)=yeB2Adx

Then (2) becomes

(4)z(x)=rz(x)

Where r is given by

(5)r=st=2AB2BA+B24AC4A2

Substituting the values of A,B,C from (3) in the above and simplifying gives

(6)r=x2104

Comparing the above to (5) shows that

s=x210t=4

Therefore eq. (4) becomes

(7)z(x)=(x2452)z(x)

Equation (7) is now solved. After finding z(x) then y is found using the inverse transformation

y=z(x)eB2Adx

The first step is to determine the case of Kovacic algorithm this ode belongs to. There are 3 cases depending on the order of poles of r and the order of r at . The following table summarizes these cases.

Case

Allowed pole order for r

Allowed value for O()

1

{0,1,2,4,6,8,}

{,6,4,2,0,2,3,4,5,6,}

2

Need to have at least one pole that is either order 2 or odd order greater than 2. Any other pole order is allowed as long as the above condition is satisfied. Hence the following set of pole orders are all allowed. {1,2},{1,3},{2},{3},{3,4},{1,2,5}.

no condition

3

{1,2}

{2,3,4,5,6,7,}

Table 2.742: Necessary conditions for each Kovacic case

The order of r at is the degree of t minus the degree of s. Therefore

O()=deg(t)deg(s)=02=2

There are no poles in r. Therefore the set of poles Γ is empty. Since there is no odd order pole larger than 2 and the order at is 2 then the necessary conditions for case one are met. Therefore

L=[1]

Attempting to find a solution using case n=1.

Since the order of r at is Or()=2 then

v=Or()2=22=1

[r] is the sum of terms involving xi for 0iv in the Laurent series for r at . Therefore

[r]=i=0vaixi(8)=i=01aixi

Let a be the coefficient of xv=x1 in the above sum. The Laurent series of r at is

(9)rx252x254x31254x5312516x72187516x932812532x11257812532x13+

Comparing Eq. (9) with Eq. (8) shows that

a=12

From Eq. (9) the sum up to v=1 gives

[r]=i=01aixi(10)=x2

Now we need to find b, where b be the coefficient of xv1=x0=1 in r minus the coefficient of same term but in ([r])2 where [r] was found above in Eq (10). Hence

([r])2=x24

This shows that the coefficient of 1 in the above is 0. Now we need to find the coefficient of 1 in r. How this is done depends on if v=0 or not. Since v=1 which is not zero, then starting r=st, we do long division and write this in the form

r=Q+Rt

Where Q is the quotient and R is the remainder. Then the coefficient of 1 in r will be the coefficient this term in the quotient. Doing long division gives

r=st=x2104=Q+R4=(x2452)+(0)=x2452

We see that the coefficient of the term 1x in the quotient is 52. Now b can be found.

b=(52)(0)=52

Hence

[r]=x2α+=12(bav)=12(52121)=3α=12(bav)=12(52121)=2

The following table summarizes the findings so far for poles and for the order of r at where r is

r=x2452

Order of r at [r] α+ α
2 x2 3 2

Now that the all [r]c and its associated αc± have been determined for all the poles in the set Γ and [r] and its associated α± have also been found, the next step is to determine possible non negative integer d from these using

d=αs()cΓαcs(c)

Where s(c) is either + or and s() is the sign of α±. This is done by trial over all set of families s=(s(c))cΓ until such d is found to work in finding candidate ω. Trying α=2, and since there are no poles then

d=α=2

Since d an integer and d0 then it can be used to find ω using

ω=cΓ(s(c)[r]c+αcs(c)xc)+s()[r]

The above gives

ω=()[r]=0+()(x2)=x2=x2

Now that ω is determined, the next step is find a corresponding minimal polynomial p(x) of degree d=2 to solve the ode. The polynomial p(x) needs to satisfy the equation

(1A)p+2ωp+(ω+ω2r)p=0

Let

(2A)p(x)=x2+a1x+a0

Substituting the above in eq. (1A) gives

(2)+2(x2)(2x+a1)+((12)+(x2)2(x2452))=0a1x+2a0+2=0

Solving for the coefficients ai in the above using method of undetermined coefficients gives

{a0=1,a1=0}

Substituting these coefficients in p(x) in eq. (2A) results in

p(x)=x21

Therefore the first solution to the ode z=rz is

z1(x)=peωdx=(x21)ex2dx=(x21)ex24=(x21)ex24

The first solution to the original ode in y is found from

y1=z1e12BAdx=z1e12x1dx=z1ex24=z1(ex24)

Which simplifies to

y1=x21

The second solution y2 to the original ode is found using reduction of order

y2=y1eBAdxy12dx

Substituting gives

y2=y1ex1dx(y1)2dx=y1ex22(y1)2dx=y1(ex22(x21)2dx)

Therefore the solution is

y=c1y1+c2y2=c1(x21)+c2(x21(ex22(x21)2dx))

Will add steps showing solving for IC soon.

Maple. Time used: 0.030 (sec). Leaf size: 42
ode:=diff(diff(y(x),x),x)-x*diff(y(x),x)+2*y(x) = 0; 
dsolve(ode,y(x), singsol=all);
 
y=2c1ex22x(x1)(x+1)(c1πerfi(2x2)2c2)

Maple trace

`Methods for second order ODEs: 
--- Trying classification methods --- 
trying a quadrature 
checking if the LODE has constant coefficients 
checking if the LODE is of Euler type 
trying a symmetry of the form [xi=0, eta=F(x)] 
checking if the LODE is missing y 
-> Trying a Liouvillian solution using Kovacics algorithm 
   A Liouvillian solution exists 
   Reducible group (found an exponential solution) 
   Group is reducible, not completely reducible 
   Solution has integrals. Trying a special function solution free of integrals... 
   -> Trying a solution in terms of special functions: 
      -> Bessel 
      -> elliptic 
      -> Legendre 
      <- Kummer successful 
   <- special function solution successful 
      -> Trying to convert hypergeometric functions to elementary form... 
      <- elementary form is not straightforward to achieve - returning special function solution free of uncomputed integrals 
   <- Kovacics algorithm successful`
 

Maple step by step

Let’s solved2dx2y(x)x(ddxy(x))+2y(x)=0Highest derivative means the order of the ODE is2d2dx2y(x)Assume series solution fory(x)y(x)=k=0akxkRewrite DE with series expansionsConvertx(ddxy(x))to series expansionx(ddxy(x))=k=0akkxkConvertd2dx2y(x)to series expansiond2dx2y(x)=k=2akk(k1)xk2Shift index usingk>k+2d2dx2y(x)=k=0ak+2(k+2)(k+1)xkRewrite DE with series expansionsk=0(ak+2(k+2)(k+1)ak(k2))xk=0Each term in the series must be 0, giving the recursion relation(k2+3k+2)ak+2ak(k2)=0Recursion relation; series terminates atk=2ak+2=ak(k2)k2+3k+2Apply recursion relation fork=0a2=a0Terminating series solution of the ODE. Use reduction of order to find the second linearly independent solutiony(x)=A2x2+A1xa0
Mathematica. Time used: 0.207 (sec). Leaf size: 43
ode=D[y[x],{x,2}]-x*D[y[x],x]+2*y[x]==0; 
ic={}; 
DSolve[{ode,ic},y[x],x,IncludeSingularSolutions->True]
 
y(x)(x21)(c21xeK[1]22(K[1]21)2dK[1]+c1)
Sympy
from sympy import * 
x = symbols("x") 
y = Function("y") 
ode = Eq(-x*Derivative(y(x), x) + 2*y(x) + Derivative(y(x), (x, 2)),0) 
ics = {} 
dsolve(ode,func=y(x),ics=ics)
 
False