The system to solve is
Hence in the form of \(y\left ( x_{0}\right ) =y_{0}\) and \(y^{\prime }\left ( x_{1}\right ) =y_{1}^{\prime }\) then we see that \(x_{0}=0,x_{1}=0,y_{0}=-2,y_{1}^{\prime }=8\). The general solution is
We start by generating one equation for each \(c_{i}\) by solving for these from general solution. This gives
Applying the limit
The second equation fails. We end up with only one equation which is
Now we apply the second IC. For this we have to first differentiate the solution which gives
Solving for the remaining constant in the above gives
And now we apply the second IC to (3,4) giving
Hence we end up with two equations
Hence the solution is \(c_{1}=6,c_{2}=-8\) and therefore the solution now becomes
This secondary algorithm was not needed in this case, since main algorithm will also work here. To see this lets solve this again for the \(c_{1},c_{2}\) using the main algorithm. In main algorithm the solution itself is plugged into each IC. Using the first IC here \(y\left ( 0\right ) =-2\) and since the solution is \(y=c_{1}+c_{2}e^{-x}\), then the first IC becomes
To use the second IC, we have to first differentiate the solution which gives
Applying the second IC given by \(y^{\prime }\left ( 0\right ) =8\) then the second IC gives
From (1B,2B) we see we have \(c_{c}=-8,c_{1}=6\) which is the same result found above. Hence the solution is
The only reason to try the secondary algorithm, is when the main algorithm fail for some cases.
The secondary algorithm works only when IC are given in the form \(y\left ( x_{0}\right ) =y_{0}\). It does not work for mixed IC for example \(y\left ( x_{0}\right ) +y^{\prime }\left ( x_{0}\right ) =A\).
l.488 — TeX4ht warning — “SaveEverypar’s: 4 at “begindocument and 6 “enddocument —