Let
Therefore
Step 1 In this we find all \(\left [ \sqrt {r}\right ] _{c}\) and associated \(\alpha _{c}^{\pm }\) for each pole. There is only one pole at \(x=0\) of order 4. Hence \(2v=4\). And \(v=2\). This is step (C3) now in the paper (1).
We need now to find Laurent series of \(\sqrt {r}\) expanded around \(x=c=0\). This is given by (using series command on the computer)
We need to add all terms in the Laurent series expansion of \(\sqrt {r}\) from \(v=2\) down to \(2\). Hence
Is only term from 2. Comparing the above to \(\frac {a}{\left ( x-0\right ) ^{2}}\) shows that
Hence
Where \(v=2\) and \(a=1\). We still need to find \(b\). But \(b\) is the coefficient of the term \(\frac {1}{\left ( x-0\right ) ^{v+1}}\) in \(r\) minus the coefficient of \(\frac {1}{\left ( x-0\right ) ^{v+1}}\) in \(\left [ \sqrt {r}\right ] _{c}\) which we just found above. Looking at \(r\) from Eq (1) we see that the term \(\frac {1}{\left ( x-0\right ) ^{v+1}}=\frac {1}{\left ( x-0\right ) ^{3}}\) has coefficient \(-5\). And looking at Eq (3) we see that there is no term \(\frac {1}{\left ( x-0\right ) ^{3}}\) in it. Hence
Now we found \(a,b\), then (5,6) becomes (since \(v=2\))
We are done with all the poles.
Now we consider \(O\left ( \infty \right ) \) which is \(\deg \left ( t\right ) -\deg \left ( s\right ) =4-6=-2\). Since this is even order and negative then \(-2v=-2\) or
We need the Laurent series of \(\sqrt {r}\) around \(\infty \). Using the computer this is
Now we only want the terms \(\,x^{i}\) where \(0\leq i\leq v\). This implies the above is reduced to
The \(a\) is the coefficient of \(x^{v}=x\) which is
Now we need to find \(\alpha _{\infty }^{\pm }\) associated with \(\left [ \sqrt {r}\right ] _{\infty }\). For this we need to first find \(b\). Recall from above that \(b\) is the coefficient of \(x^{v-1}\) or \(x^{0}\) in \(r\) minus the coefficient of \(x^{v-1}=x^{0}\) in \(\left ( \left [ \sqrt {r}\right ] _{\infty }\right ) ^{2}\). Since \(v=1\) then we want the coefficient of \(x^{0}\) in \(r\) and subtract from it the coefficient of \(x^{0}\) in \(\left ( \left [ \sqrt {r}\right ] _{\infty }\right ) ^{2}\). But
Hence the coefficient of \(x^{0}\) in \(\left ( \left [ \sqrt {r}\right ] _{\infty }\right ) ^{2}\) is \(1\). To find the coefficient of \(x^{0}\) in \(r\) long division is done
Where \(Q\) is the quotient and \(R\) is the remainder. This gives
For the case of \(v\neq 0\) then the coefficient is read from \(Q\) above. Which is \(3\). Hence
For the other case of \(v=0\) then the coefficient of \(x^{-1}\) in \(r\) is found using \(\frac {lcoeff\left ( R\right ) }{lcoeff\left ( t\right ) }\) which will give \(1\) in this case. (More examples below).
Now that we found \(a,b\), then from the above section describing the algorithm, we see in this case that
This completes step 1 of the solution. We have found \(\left [ \sqrt {r}\right ] _{c}\) and its associated \(\alpha _{c}^{\pm }\) and found \(\left [ \sqrt {r}\right ] _{\infty }\) and its associated \(\alpha _{\infty }^{\pm }\). Now we go to step 2 which is to find the \(d^{\prime }s\).
step 2 Since we have a pole at zero, and we have one \(O\left ( \infty \right ) \), each with \(\pm \) signs, then we set up this table to make it easier to work with. This implements
Therefore we obtain 4 possible \(d\) values.
| pole \(c\) | \(\alpha _{c}\) value | \(O\left ( \infty \right ) \) value | \(d\) | \(d\) value |
| \(x=0\) | \(\alpha _{c}^{+}=\frac {-3}{2}\) | \(\alpha _{\infty }^{+}=\frac {1}{2}\) | \(\alpha _{\infty }^{+}-\left ( \alpha _{c}^{+}\right ) =\frac {1}{2}-\left ( \frac {-3}{2}\right ) \) | \(2\) |
| \(x=0\) | \(\alpha _{c}^{+}=\frac {-3}{2}\) | \(\alpha _{\infty }^{-}=-\frac {3}{2}\) | \(\alpha _{\infty }^{-}-\left ( \alpha _{c}^{+}\right ) =-\frac {3}{2}-\left ( \frac {-3}{2}\right ) \) | \(0\) |
| \(x=0\) | \(\alpha _{c}^{-}=\frac {7}{2}\) | \(\alpha _{\infty }^{+}=\frac {1}{2}\) | \(\alpha _{\infty }^{+}-\left ( \alpha _{c}^{-}\right ) =\frac {1}{2}-\left ( \frac {7}{2}\right ) \) | \(-3\) |
| \(x=0\) | \(\alpha _{c}^{-}=\frac {7}{2}\) | \(\alpha _{\infty }^{-}=-\frac {3}{2}\) | \(\alpha _{\infty }^{-}-\left ( \alpha _{c}^{-}\right ) =-\frac {3}{2}-\left ( \frac {7}{2}\right ) \) | \(-5\) |
We see from the above that we took each pole in this problem (there is only one pole here at \(x=0\)) and its associated \(\alpha _{c}^{\pm }\) with each \(\alpha _{\infty }^{\pm }\) and generated all possible \(d\) values from all the combinations. Hence we obtain 4 possible \(d\) values in this case. If we had 2 poles, then we would have 8 possible \(d\) values. Hence the maximum possible \(d\) values we can get is \(2^{p+1}\) where \(p\) is number of poles. Now we remove all negative \(d\) values. Hence the trial \(d\) values remaining is
Now for each \(d\) value, we generate \(\omega \) using
To apply the above, we update the table above, now using only \(d=0,d=2\) values, but also add columns for \(\left [ \sqrt {r}\right ] _{c},\left [ \sqrt {r}\right ] _{\infty }\) to make the computation easier. Here is the new table
| pole \(c\) | \(\alpha _{c}\) value | \(s\left ( c\right ) \) | \(\left [ \sqrt {r}\right ] _{c}\) | \(O\left ( \infty \right ) \) value | \(s\left ( \infty \right ) \) | \(\left [ \sqrt {r}\right ] _{\infty }\) | \(d\) value |
|
||
| \(x=0\) | \(\alpha _{c}^{+}=\frac {-3}{2}\) | \(+\) | \(\frac {1}{x^{2}}\) | \(\alpha _{\infty }^{-}=-\frac {3}{2}\) | \(-\) | \(x-1\) | \(0\) | \(\left ( +\left ( \frac {1}{x^{2}}\right ) +\frac {\frac {-3}{2}}{x-0}\right ) +\left ( -\right ) \left ( x-1\right ) =\frac {1}{x^{2}}-\frac {3}{2x}-x+1\) | ||
| \(x=0\) | \(\alpha _{c}^{+}=\frac {-3}{2}\) | \(+\) | \(\frac {1}{x^{2}}\) | \(\alpha _{\infty }^{+}=\frac {1}{2}\) | \(+\) | \(x-1\) | \(2\) | \(\left ( +\left ( \frac {1}{x^{2}}\right ) +\frac {\frac {-3}{2}}{x-0}\right ) +\left ( +\right ) \left ( x-1\right ) =x-\frac {3}{2x}+\frac {1}{x^{2}}-1\) | ||
The above are the two candidate \(\omega \) values. For each \(\omega \) we need to find polynomial \(P\) by solving
If we are able to find \(P\), then we stop and the ode \(y^{\prime \prime }=ry\) is solved. If we try all candidate \(\omega \) and can not find \(P\) then this case is not successful and we go to the next case.
step 3 Now for each candidate \(\omega \) we solve the above Eq (8). Starting with \(\omega =\frac {1}{x^{2}}-\frac {3}{2x}-x+1\) associated with \(d=0\) in the table, then (8) becomes
Since this the case for \(d=0\), then \(P\) has zero degree, Hence \(P\) is constant. Therefore the above simplifies to
Which means
Which is not possible for all \(x\). Hence \(d=0\) do not generate valid \(P\) polynomial. We now try the case of \(d=2\). Since \(d=2\), it means the polynomial \(d\) is of degree two. Let
Substituting this in (8) using \(\omega =x-\frac {3}{2x}+\frac {1}{x^{2}}-1\). This gives
Using \(P=x^{2}+ax+b\) the above becomes
Therefore
hence \(a=0\) from last equation. Using first or second equation gives \(b=-1\). Therefore a solution is found. Hence
Therefore the solution to \(y^{\prime \prime }=ry\) is
The second solution can be found by reduction of order.