Internal
problem
ID
[8454]
Book
:
Collection
of
Kovacic
problems
Section
:
section
1
Problem
number
:
321
Date
solved
:
Monday, October 21, 2024 at 05:08:08 PM
CAS
classification
:
[[_2nd_order, _with_linear_symmetries]]
Solve
Time used: 0.381 (sec)
Writing the ode as
Comparing (1) and (2) shows that
Applying the Liouville transformation on the dependent variable gives
Then (2) becomes
Where \(r\) is given by
Substituting the values of \(A,B,C\) from (3) in the above and simplifying gives
Comparing the above to (5) shows that
Therefore eq. (4) becomes
Equation (7) is now solved. After finding \(z(x)\) then \(y\) is found using the inverse transformation
The first step is to determine the case of Kovacic algorithm this ode belongs to. There are 3 cases depending on the order of poles of \(r\) and the order of \(r\) at \(\infty \). The following table summarizes these cases.
Case |
Allowed pole order for \(r\) |
Allowed value for \(\mathcal {O}(\infty )\) |
1 |
\(\left \{ 0,1,2,4,6,8,\cdots \right \} \) |
\(\left \{ \cdots ,-6,-4,-2,0,2,3,4,5,6,\cdots \right \} \) |
2 |
Need to have at least one pole that is either order \(2\) or odd order greater than \(2\). Any other pole order is allowed as long as the above condition is satisfied. Hence the following set of pole orders are all allowed. \(\{1,2\}\),\(\{1,3\}\),\(\{2\}\),\(\{3\}\),\(\{3,4\}\),\(\{1,2,5\}\). |
no condition |
3 |
\(\left \{ 1,2\right \} \) |
\(\left \{ 2,3,4,5,6,7,\cdots \right \} \) |
The order of \(r\) at \(\infty \) is the degree of \(t\) minus the degree of \(s\). Therefore
The poles of \(r\) in eq. (7) and the order of each pole are determined by solving for the roots of \(t=4 \left (x^{2}+2\right )^{2}\). There is a pole at \(x=i \sqrt {2}\) of order \(2\). There is a pole at \(x=-i \sqrt {2}\) of order \(2\). Since there is no odd order pole larger than \(2\) and the order at \(\infty \) is \(2\) then the necessary conditions for case one are met. Since there is a pole of order \(2\) then necessary conditions for case two are met. Since pole order is not larger than \(2\) and the order at \(\infty \) is \(2\) then the necessary conditions for case three are met. Therefore
Attempting to find a solution using case \(n=1\).
Unable to find solution using case one
Attempting to find a solution using case \(n=2\).
Looking at poles of order 2. The partial fractions decomposition of \(r\) is
For the pole at \(x=i \sqrt {2}\) let \(b\) be the coefficient of \(\frac {1}{ \left (x -i \sqrt {2}\right )^{2}}\) in the partial fractions decomposition of \(r\) given above. Therefore \(b=-{\frac {3}{16}}\). Hence
For the pole at \(x=-i \sqrt {2}\) let \(b\) be the coefficient of \(\frac {1}{ \left (x +i \sqrt {2}\right )^{2}}\) in the partial fractions decomposition of \(r\) given above. Therefore \(b=-{\frac {3}{16}}\). Hence
Since the order of \(r\) at \(\infty \) is 2 then let \(b\) be the coefficient of \(\frac {1}{x^{2}}\) in the Laurent series expansion of \(r\) at \(\infty \). which can be found by dividing the leading coefficient of \(s\) by the leading coefficient of \(t\) from
Since the \(\text {gcd}(s,t)=1\). This gives \(b={\frac {7}{4}}\). Hence
The following table summarizes the findings so far for poles and for the order of \(r\) at \(\infty \) for case 2 of Kovacic algorithm.
pole \(c\) location | pole order | \(E_c\) |
\(i \sqrt {2}\) | \(2\) | \(\{1, 2, 3\}\) |
\(-i \sqrt {2}\) | \(2\) | \(\{1, 2, 3\}\) |
Order of \(r\) at \(\infty \) | \(E_\infty \) |
\(2\) | \(\{2\}\) |
Using the family \(\{e_1,e_2,\dots ,e_\infty \}\) given by
Gives a non negative integer \(d\) (the degree of the polynomial \(p(x)\)), which is generated using
We now form the following rational function
Now we search for a monic polynomial \(p(x)\) of degree \(d=0\) such that
Since \(d=0\), then letting
Substituting \(p\) and \(\theta \) into Eq. (1A) gives
And solving for \(p\) gives
Now that \(p(x)\) is found let
Let \(\omega \) be the solution of
Substituting the values for \(\phi \) and \(r\) into the above equation gives
Solving for \(\omega \) gives
Therefore the first solution to the ode \(z'' = r z\) is
The first solution to the original ode in \(y\) is found from
Which simplifies to
The second solution \(y_2\) to the original ode is found using reduction of order
Substituting gives
Therefore the solution is
Will add steps showing solving for IC soon.
Methods for second order ODEs:
Solving time : 0.024
(sec)
Leaf size : 45
dsolve((x^2+2)*diff(diff(y(x),x),x)+3*x*diff(y(x),x)-y(x) = 0, y(x),singsol=all)
Solving time : 0.14
(sec)
Leaf size : 92
DSolve[{(x^2+2)*D[y[x],{x,2}]+3*x*D[y[x],x]-y[x]==0,{}}, y[x],x,IncludeSingularSolutions->True]