problem:
Consider the problem of minimizing the functional over all
with
at boundary
where
is a given function.
is bounded and well behaved in
(a) Show that the first variation is (Where below is meant to be
) where
is the vector
Where is the vector
and
with
at the boundary
(b)Show that the necessary condition for to minimize
is that
must satisfy the Euler equation
,
(c)If is not fixed on the boundary
find the natural boundary conditions.
Answer
(a)
Hence
But , hence at
the above becomes
![]() | (1) |
But , hence
, and
, therefore
Hence (1) becomes
![]() | (2) |
Now
Hence
Hence substitute the above in (2) for we obtain
Now using Green theorem, where
Let , hence Green theorem becomes
Substitute the above into second term in (3) we obtain (noting that since we are in
)
![]() | (4) |
But the second integral above can be rewritten as (by dividing and multiplying by )
Hence (4) becomes
![]() | (5) |
Now Tangent vector at the boundary at point is given by vector
, hence the normal is
(since if we take dot product of these 2 vectors we get zero). Now we can rewrite the
integrand in the second integral in (5) in terms of this normal vector since
Substitute the above into the second term of (5) we obtain
Final note on the sign before the second integral above. The book shows it as . I think this is because
the normal should be pointing outside? Hence if we make out normal the negative of the normal
used here (which I think points inwards), we obtain the result we are asked to show for part (a).
(notice, the book has a mistake/typo, it says
instead of
, i.e. the
integration is over a line segment, not over a differential area (since obviously this is contour
integration).
part (b)
Necessary condition for minimum is that ,. ie.
Now consider the second integral in the above. Since on
, hence we are left to show
that
But is arbitrary function, hence by lemma 3.13 again, we argue that for the above to be zero,
then
Which is Euler-Lagrange equation.
Part (c)
Here we have free boundary conditions. Hence we can not take everywhere on
. Starting with the
first variation
Since on
then by lemma 3.13 we can argue that
on
Hence on , this means
, i.e.
Now we need to know the shape of the boundary to evaluate the above at each point. For example, for a
circle, and the above become
And the above equation needs to be satisfied at each point on the boundary after discretization.