problem: Find extrermals for the following functional:
(b)
Solution:
Assume first that has normal conditions on the boundaries. I.e.
We have the functional
and we seek to find a function which minimizes this functional.
Let the vector space from which we can pick from be
And let the set of admissible functions (within ) (Is this set a subspace?) be defined as
And let the set of admissible directions be
Use the variational method since the Lagrangian contains a quadratic terms.
rearrange terms
Hence if we can find which will make the last term above zero, then will have been minimized by this
Therefor the problem now becomes of solving for the following integral equation
| (1) |
We need to try to convert the above into something like so that we can say that , so this means in (1) we need to do integration by parts on the term . Hence (1) can be written as
Now since , now let and let , hence we have
Hence (1) can be written as
Now we apply the standard argument and say that since is arbitrary function, and the integral above is always zero, then it must be that
or
This is a linear second order ODE with constant coefficients with a forcing function. The homogeneous ODE will have 2 independent solutions, say and , so the total solution is
To solve the homogeneous ODE
Assume the solution is , hence the characteristic equation is hence the solution is , so
Or the solution can be written in hyperbolic sin and cosine
Now to find particular solution, use variation of parameters. Assume
where
Where
Hence
and
Hence the solution is
Hence
problem: Show that the minimal area of a surface of revolution in a catenoid, that is, the surface found by revolving a catenary
about the axis
solution:
First we assume that over the integration range. And that the lower end of the integration is smaller than the upper limit
If we view a small at we see that it has a length of
Hence
or we can also write
So there are 2 ways to solve this depending if we use (1) or (2). Let us leave the choice open for a little longer.
Now a size of a differential area of a strip of width and a length given by the circumference of the circle generated by rotation is
Hence the total surface area is the integral of the above over the range which is defined at. Let this be from to is given by
Since we have already in the Lagrangian, let then pick expression (2) from the above.
Now I need to change the limits. Let , and let hence
If we write the above in the more standard format, we have
Remember now that is the independent variable, and is the dependent variable. This is different from the normal way.
Hence the Lagrangian is
| (3) |
If I had picked expression (1) instead, I would have obtained the Lagrangian as
| (4) |
Both will give the same answer but with (3) we have and the first term since does not depend on , and now we can just say that constant,. While with (4) we have now is not zero.
Now we continue, and we will use (3) as our lagrangian.
We start the solution of the problem. We seek a function which minimizes .
Where s.t. , and let the set of admissible functions
,
and let the set of admissible directions
Now that we have written down all the formal definitions, we can just solve this by applying Euler-Lagrange equation since the Lagrangian above meets the conditions of using Euler-Lagrange equations ( is a function of and is defined at the boundary conditions with a dirichlet type boundary conditions).
The Euler Lagrangian equation is
Since does NOT depend on then , and the above reduces to
Since the derivative is zero, then we can write that
Where is some constant. So the above becomes
Hence we have
Hence the final ODE is
This is a linear ODE Its solution is found by integration both side as follows
Let hence and the above becomes (do not need to worry about limits of integrations, as I will flip back the earlier variable in a minute)
Which from table is given by
Where is constant of integration. Hence going back to our variables, we have
| (3) |
From tables I found that
Hence (3) can now be written as
Or
Then
So the above curve will minimize the surface area.
Problem 1 (section 3.3,#14, page 177)
answer:
but
Hence
Hence the Lagrangian is
since is defined at boundaries of the interval, we can use Euler-Lagrange equations
Now the first term above is
and the second term is
Hence our E-L equations now looks like
| (1) |
Since is a function of , then
And (1) now becomes
This is separable ODE, hence
Integrate both sides
where is constant on integration
where is another constant
But hence and the above becomes
Where since is constant, I call it
Now, Since
Then
The solution is
Assume , hence
So the solution is
For the particular solution, guess a solution. Since the forcing function is of the form , guess
so and we substitute this solution in the ODE above, we obtain
so by comparing exponents, we see that and hence
Therefore
Hence, since
Then
We now find and from I.C. At , hence
at , hence
so from (2)
Hence
and
Analysis on results:
These are 3 plots showing and . The first is for
This one is for
We notice that the higher the interest rate is the more capital will accumulate, which means to achieve the goal of zero capital at death the rate is more steep near the end. If the money hardly accumulate during life time, i.e. when the interest rate is very low, then we should expect a straight line for , which is verified by this plot below when I set